In July 2025, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. stood before Congress and acknowledged what many Filipinos already knew: billions of pesos meant to protect communities from floods had been stolen. His call for lawmakers to “have some shame” reflected a crisis that has shaken public trust in government projects. At the same time, the administration is pushing ahead with the largest infrastructure program in Philippine history — 209 flagship projects worth P10.5 trillion, from the Metro Manila Subway to the New Manila International Airport. These two realities — ambitious development and systemic corruption — are shaping Filipino society in ways that affect daily life, from commute times to the safety of homes during typhoon season.
The gap between what government projects promise and what they deliver has become a defining feature of Filipino civic life. On one side are transformative rail systems, airport expansions, and digital connectivity programs. On the other are ghost flood-control structures, diverted funds, and a public works system that investigators have described as operating like organized crime. Understanding how these projects actually affect Filipino society means looking at both sides of the ledger.
Two Sides of Infrastructure: Development and Diversion
Government projects in the Philippines fall into two broad categories that affect society in very different ways. The first is large-scale transport and connectivity infrastructure — rail lines, airports, bridges, and highways that aim to reduce travel times, move goods more efficiently, and attract investment. The second is climate resilience and public welfare infrastructure — flood control systems, drainage, and digital networks designed to protect communities and expand opportunity. Both categories receive massive funding, but they have produced sharply different results for ordinary Filipinos.
The transport and digital projects represent a genuine effort to modernize the country. The Metro Manila Subway — the nation’s first — and the North-South Commuter Railway, funded by the Asian Development Bank and Japan International Cooperation Agency, are concrete steps toward solving the capital’s notorious traffic. The National Fiber Backbone, once complete, could raise broadband penetration from 33% to 65%. These are projects with visible, measurable outputs. But the flood control story shows a different pattern entirely.
When Corruption Redesigns the Budget
The problem is not that the government lacks money for projects. The Department of Public Works and Highways budget for flood control has more than doubled since 2015. The issue is how much of that money actually reaches the ground. A Senate probe led by Senator Panfilo Lacson estimated that approximately P180 billion allocated for flood control had been diverted to ghost projects since 2016. Greenpeace put the potential losses even higher — as much as P1 trillion in flood control and climate-related projects from 2023 to 2025. Government engineers testified that lawmakers received kickbacks from nearly all public works projects, including roads, streetlighting, and multipurpose buildings. The system worked like this: lawmakers inserted projects into the national budget on condition they would receive kickbacks; DPWH engineers acted as go-betweens with contractors who paid to secure contracts; engineers collected payoffs, kept a share, and delivered the balance in cash-filled suitcases to legislative aides during meetings in Manila hotels and exclusive villages.
The scale of the diversion is staggering. At least 45 individuals face charges across the Sandiganbayan and regional trial courts, including two sitting Congress members, two former lawmakers, 33 former DPWH officials, and eight contractors. The Independent Commission for Infrastructure, created by President Marcos and dissolved after seven months, recommended filing charges against two senators, two members of Congress, a DPWH engineer, and a Commission on Audit commissioner. At least 43 more individuals remain under investigation. In 2022, 67 members of Congress were public works contractors for their own state-funded projects, and over 30 contractors awarded government projects were illegal campaign donors to senators and representatives.
Accountability Gaps That Enable the System
Several structural factors have allowed corruption to persist. Procurement reforms introduced in 2010 were abolished, removing key safeguards. Restrictions on asset declarations were lifted, and threats to whistleblowers increased. Since 2020, access to the statements of assets, liabilities, and net worth of public officials has been restricted, limiting transparency. Whistleblowers in the Philippines rarely prevail against powerful interests — one example is Niruh Kyle Antatico, who was shot in Cagayan de Oro after exposing corruption in the National Irrigation Administration.
The Department of Transportation faces a different but related challenge: retaining skilled personnel. Approximately 400 engineers have resigned due to better private-sector salaries and salary delays. This talent drain affects the government’s ability to oversee and implement complex projects, creating further openings for mismanagement. The newly established Flagship Project Management Office, led personally by Transportation Secretary Vince Dizon, aims to impose strict deadlines on key projects and cultivate a stable workforce, but the retention problem remains structural.
The 2026 budget reflects the fallout: funding for flood control projects was drastically reduced, yet hundreds of millions in “allocables” — funds assigned to legislative districts — remained, creating new opportunities for graft. The so-called BBM Parametric Formula directed the bulk of allocable funds to the districts of Ilocos Norte Rep. Sandro Marcos and Speaker Martin Romualdez from 2023 to 2025, according to investigative reports. An August 2025 complaint-affidavit accused Romualdez of receiving P56 billion in payoffs from government projects between 2022 and 2025, based on Facebook recordings and testimony from his former bodyguards who claimed they delivered cash to his aides.
What Citizens Can Watch For and What Reforms Are Underway
The situation is not static. Several developments offer potential paths forward, though their effectiveness remains to be seen.
Independent Commission for Infrastructure findings. The ICI, which operated from September 2025 to March 2026, submitted its findings to the Ombudsman on March 13, 2026, recommending charges against specific officials. The Ombudsman’s office, now led by Jesus Crispin Remulla, has continued investigations. Remulla lifted restrictions on asset statements, restoring some transparency. Citizens can monitor the Ombudsman’s public docket for updates on these cases.
Infrastructure flagship projects with international oversight. Projects funded by the Asian Development Bank and Japan International Cooperation Agency — like the North-South Commuter Railway and Metro Manila Subway — come with multilateral procurement and audit requirements that provide stronger accountability layers than purely national projects. The overall infrastructure program driving growth includes these internationally-backed initiatives that offer more transparency.
Digital infrastructure as a transparency tool. The Philippine Digital Infrastructure Project and National Fiber Backbone, while primarily about connectivity, also enable better monitoring of government transactions. The World Bank-funded PDIP includes network security components that could support more transparent public financial management. The 5G rollout and broader digital transformation create infrastructure that can power accountability systems.
Public pressure and civic action. Following revelations, citizens threw mud at properties of DPWH contractors, protested in front of Congress, marched on EDSA, and held rallies nationwide demanding imprisonment of all culprits regardless of political influence. Progressive groups have urged the Ombudsman to probe former officials for violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. Public attention on the 2026 budget and the distribution of allocable funds remains a key leverage point.
Practical Steps for Tracking Project Impact
For Filipinos who want to monitor government projects in their communities:
- Check the DPWH and DOTr project websites for publicly listed infrastructure projects and their status updates
- Review the Commission on Audit annual audit reports for specific projects — COA reports are public documents that often flag irregularities
- Monitor the Ombudsman’s office for investigation updates, particularly cases referred by the Independent Commission for Infrastructure
- Track budget allocations through the Department of Budget and Management’s online portal, especially for flood control and public works in your region
- Report suspected ghost projects or substandard work to the COA, Ombudsman, or through the Presidential Complaint Center
The sustainable infrastructure agenda depends on these accountability mechanisms functioning effectively. Without them, even well-designed projects risk being undermined.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money has been lost to corruption in flood control projects?▾
What are the biggest infrastructure projects currently underway?▾
Who has been charged in the flood control corruption scandal?▾
How does the government plan to improve digital connectivity?▾
What is the Build Better More program?▾
How does infrastructure spending affect the Philippine economy?▾
What role do international partners play in Philippine infrastructure?▾
How can citizens report suspected corruption in government projects?▾
The coming years will test whether the accountability mechanisms now in motion can match the scale of the problem. The Ombudsman’s investigations, the fate of the 45 charged individuals, and the transparency of the 2026 budget’s allocable funds will all signal whether the system is correcting itself. For ordinary Filipinos, the most practical step is to stay informed about projects in their own communities — and to hold local officials accountable for what gets built versus what gets billed. If this was useful, you might also want to read the future of public transport in Metro Manila’s railways.
Sources
Philippines infrastructure driving growth — Overview of the infrastructure program and its economic impact.
Sustainable infrastructure paving the way for a greener Philippines — Context on long-term infrastructure planning and environmental considerations.
Accountability washed away in Philippine flood control corruption. East Asia Forum, 2025.
One year after the flood control speech. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism, 2026.
Gov’t flagship infra projects raised to 209, worth P10.5T. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 2025.
PHL flagship projects and Pinoy commuters: Inside the DOTr’s new infrastructure initiative. BusinessMirror, 2025.
Philippines transport infrastructure. U.S. Commercial Service, 2025.
PBBM’s digital infra projects create opportunities for Filipinos. Philippine News Agency, 2024.
