Loyzaga emphasizes the need for a collective societal effort to tackle plastic pollution.

The Philippines generates approximately 2.7 million metric tons of plastic waste each year, and a significant portion of that ends up in the ocean, placing the country among the top contributors to marine plastic pollution globally. That figure translates to roughly 61,000 metric tons of total waste per day, of which 12 to 24 percent is plastic, according to DENR data. The bulk of this material does not get recycled — it accumulates in landfills, dumpsites, and natural environments, where it contributes to flooding risks and climate-related hazards.

These numbers are not abstract. For coastal communities, plastic pollution directly affects fisheries, tourism, and daily living conditions. The problem has drawn attention at the highest levels of government, and in January 2025, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), led by Secretary Maria Antonia Yulo Loyzaga, launched the National Plastic Action Partnership (NPAP) to coordinate a national response. The initiative is part of a broader push to move away from a linear “take-make-waste” model and toward a circular economy — one where materials are reused rather than discarded. For a closer look at how industrial activity contributes to this challenge, you can read about key cases of industrial pollution in the Philippines.

What the National Plastic Action Partnership actually does

The NPAP is not a standalone project. It is the Philippine chapter of the Global Plastic Action Partnership (GPAP), an initiative of the World Economic Forum supported by the governments of the United Kingdom and Canada, as well as the Coca-Cola Foundation. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) hosts the NPAP Secretariat, providing technical and operational support. The partnership aligns with several national policies: the Philippine Development Plan, the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Act, the Philippine Action Plan for Sustainable Consumption and Production, and the country’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement.

Secretary Loyzaga described the initiative as a mechanism to unify and amplify collective efforts. “This platform will truly catalyze a transition to a circular economy, one that views plastic waste not as an insurmountable burden but as an opportunity,” she said during the launch at the Marco Polo Hotel in January 2025. The roadmap under development will also integrate a gender and social inclusion strategy, ensuring that informal waste pickers and other marginalized groups are not left behind in the transition.

Why the crisis demands more than environmental action

Loyzaga has been explicit that plastic pollution is not solely an environmental issue. “This crisis extends far beyond environmental degradation; it’s a multifaceted crisis that threatens our biodiversity, our ecosystems’ integrity, sustainable livelihoods, and our own public health,” she said at the NPAP launch. The cost of inaction, she added, is staggering — particularly for vulnerable coastal communities that bear the heaviest burden.

The connection between waste management and disaster risk is often overlooked. When plastic waste clogs waterways and drainage systems, it exacerbates flooding during typhoons — a recurring threat in the Philippines. Loyzaga specifically noted that the disaster risk reduction and climate change communities need to be involved in addressing waste management. This cross-sectoral framing is central to the NPAP’s design. The partnership does not treat plastic pollution as a standalone problem but as something intertwined with development, equity, and resilience. For more context on how pollution affects the country’s waterways, see this overview of marine pollution challenges in the Philippines.

The NPAP also connects to international commitments. Loyzaga referenced the Paris Agreement, the Sustainable Development Goals, the Global Biodiversity Framework, and marine litter reduction targets. The idea is that domestic action on plastics supports multiple global obligations simultaneously — making the partnership a practical tool for meeting several pledges at once.

What complicates the picture — enforcement, compliance, and blind spots

→ Scroll right to see all columns

The Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Act of 2022 is a cornerstone of the NPAP’s strategy. It requires producers to recover and divert at least 20 percent of their plastic footprint by 2023 and 40 percent by 2024. As of May 2024, 917 companies had registered under the program, according to the DENR’s Environmental Management Bureau. But registration is not the same as compliance. DENR Undersecretary Jonas Leones acknowledged that the NPAP will assess EPR implementation and identify gaps. “We hope that we’ll be able to identify areas for strengthening the EPR and how we can improve compliance,” he said.

The enforcement gap

Leones indicated that the DENR will soon issue notices of violation to non-compliant companies. He also raised the possibility of revoking business permits for persistent violators, though he stressed the need for policies that are both enforceable and acceptable to all sectors. “We do not want to issue policies that the DENR cannot even implement,” he said. The DENR is also working with the Department of Finance and the Department of Trade and Industry to create incentives for compliant companies. A finalized measure was expected by June 2025.

The informal sector blind spot

One of the less discussed challenges is the role of informal waste pickers. These workers handle a significant portion of recyclable materials but operate outside formal systems, often without protections or stable income. The NPAP’s roadmap includes a gender and social inclusion strategy specifically to address this. But integrating informal workers into a formal circular economy is logistically and politically difficult — it requires registration, fair compensation, health protections, and coordination with local governments. The roadmap is expected to outline how this will work, but the details remain to be seen.

Data gaps and baseline uncertainty

The NPAP’s first priority is creating a comprehensive plastic baseline analysis. Without reliable data on exactly how much plastic is produced, consumed, discarded, and leaked into the environment, it is difficult to measure progress. The current estimate of 2.7 million metric tons annually is widely cited, but the distribution across sectors, regions, and waste streams is less clear. The baseline study aims to close that gap and inform the National Plastic Action Roadmap, which is targeted for completion by August 2025.

What the roadmap means for businesses, communities, and local governments

The NPAP is not just a policy document — it is designed to produce concrete outputs that different stakeholders can use. For businesses, particularly those covered by the EPR Act, the roadmap will clarify compliance requirements, investment needs, and potential financing instruments. For local government units (LGUs), it will provide guidance on waste management infrastructure and collection systems. For communities, especially those near coastlines or dumpsites, the roadmap is supposed to deliver measurable reductions in plastic leakage and improved public health outcomes.

For businesses: compliance and financing pathways

The roadmap will include an investment requirements section and a financing roadmap that blends incentives with innovative financing instruments. Companies that have already registered under the EPR program — 917 as of May 2024 — will need to track their plastic footprint and demonstrate recovery. The DENR is exploring both penalties for non-compliance and rewards for early action. Leones mentioned that the NPAP could help develop policies that make compliance easier to verify and enforce.

For local governments: infrastructure and collection

LGUs are on the front line of waste management, but many lack the resources to handle the volume of plastic waste generated daily. The NPAP does not directly fund infrastructure projects, but its roadmap is expected to identify priority areas for investment and link LGUs with potential financing sources. The partnership also aims to standardize data collection so that local governments can track their own progress against national targets.

For informal workers: inclusion and protection

The gender and social inclusion strategy within the roadmap is meant to ensure that informal waste pickers are recognized, organized, and compensated fairly. This is one of the more complex parts of the transition, because it requires changing how waste is valued and who benefits from its recovery. The NPAP’s secretariat, hosted by UNDP, has experience in community-based programs, but the success of this component will depend on local implementation.

• 1
  Complete the plastic baseline analysis

  The NPAP’s first deliverable is a comprehensive assessment of plastic production, consumption, and leakage across the country. This will establish a measurable starting point.

• 2
  Publish the National Plastic Action Roadmap

  Targeted for August 2025, the roadmap will outline specific targets, investment needs, financing mechanisms, and timelines for each sector.

• 3
  Enforce EPR compliance and issue penalties

  The DENR will issue notices of violation to non-compliant companies and work with the DTI and DOF to create incentive structures for early adopters.

For a broader look at how waste management innovations are being developed, see this piece on eco-friendly innovations in waste management.

Frequently asked questions about the NPAP and plastic pollution in the Philippines

What to watch for next

The NPAP’s success will depend on whether its roadmap translates into measurable reductions in plastic leakage — not just more meetings and documents. The August 2025 deadline for the National Plastic Action Roadmap is the first real milestone. If the baseline analysis is thorough and the roadmap includes enforceable targets with clear financing, the partnership could shift how the country manages plastic waste. If enforcement remains weak and compliance voluntary, the 2.7 million metric tons figure will keep climbing. The next few months will show which direction things are heading. If this was useful, you might also want to read more about the impact of marine pollution on Philippine ecosystems.

Sources

Key cases of industrial pollution in the Philippines — A closer look at how industrial activity contributes to the country’s pollution burden.

Eco-friendly innovations in waste management — Practical examples of how communities and businesses are tackling waste differently.

Philippines launches National Plastic Action Partnership to tackle plastic waste and advance circular economy. United Nations Development Programme, 2025.

Gov’t launches ‘action partnership’ to curb plastic pollution. Philippine News Agency, 2025.

DENR Secretary Loyzaga’s speech at the launch of the Philippine National Plastic Action Partnership. Daily Tribune, 2025.