When a single employee hands in their notice, it’s rarely just one person’s decision anymore. Aon’s 2025 Salary Increase and Turnover Study projects a 20% attrition rate for the Philippines in 2026, meaning one in five skilled workers is likely to leave their job. That already places the country ahead of Singapore’s projected 19.3% and Malaysia’s 18.2%. But the real risk isn’t just the number — it’s how fast one resignation pulls others with it. Research shows that 70% of employees who witness a coworker’s resignation are inclined to resign themselves. When an entire team leaves at once, it’s rarely a coincidence — and rarely about any single reason.
Why Teams Leave Together: The Main Drivers
Mass resignations don’t come out of nowhere. They build from a mix of conditions that, once triggered, can unravel a team in days. Based on patterns observed across industries, three categories explain most of what’s happening.
These drivers don’t operate in isolation. A team with low pay and a toxic manager is a ticking clock. Add a competitor’s offer to one key employee, and the rest can follow within weeks.
How the Domino Effect Spreads Through a Team
The mechanics of a mass resignation follow a surprisingly predictable pattern. When one team member leaves voluntarily, the probability that others will follow rises by 9.1%. Even an involuntary departure — a layoff or termination — increases the likelihood of further exits by 7.7%.
Team size matters. Workers in groups of 3 to 5 are 12.1% more likely to leave when a teammate quits. In groups of 6 to 10, that number jumps to 14.5%. Smaller teams feel the absence more acutely, and the remaining workload shifts visibly.
The timing is also telling. The peak of the turnover epidemic hits about 70 days after the initial voluntary resignation. The infection window — the period during which departures are most likely to cluster — extends up to 135 days. This means a manager who sees one resignation in March could still be losing people in July if the root causes aren’t addressed.
This pattern is especially relevant in the Philippine context, where collectivist workplace dynamics mean team cohesion and interpersonal loyalty often drive decisions. When a trusted colleague leaves, it can signal that the job is no longer worth staying for.
The Mistakes That Make Things Worse
When a mass resignation starts, the natural instinct is to react fast. But several common responses backfire.
One-off retention bonuses or hastily arranged meetings to “check in” often signal panic rather than genuine concern. When employees see management scrambling after departures but ignoring problems before, it confirms their suspicions. Temporary measures can actually increase demands — employees may recognize their leverage and push for more.
Targeting only the people who are considering leaving is another trap. When colleagues notice that certain team members are getting special treatment — raises, flexible hours, or perks — those who weren’t planning to leave may start wondering why they’re not being valued. Selective retention can create a new wave of departures.
The research also highlights that simply labeling conversations as “retention efforts” can backfire. Employees can smell a sales pitch. Instead, regular one-on-one meetings that are genuinely open and honest — held long before a crisis — build the trust needed to surface problems early.
What to Do When Your Team Starts to Unravel
The first step is admitting that the current approach isn’t working. If multiple people are leaving, the problem is systemic, not personal. The response has to be broad and lasting.
Start with exit interviews — but ask the right questions. The Emerge Talent guide recommends gathering data through structured exit interviews and casual conversations, though honesty isn’t guaranteed. Pair this with stay-interviews: candid talks with current employees about what keeps them and what might push them away.
The research points to several systemic changes that actually work:
– Firing toxic managers, not just reassigning them
– Changing restrictive policies that make work harder than it needs to be
– Offering meaningful raises and bonuses tied to market rates, not symbolic gestures
– Reversing decisions that caused the walkout, when possible
Follow us on LinkedIn!
The average budgeted salary increase across Southeast Asia for 2026 is expected to reach 5.3%, according to Aon’s study. Companies that fall significantly below this benchmark while competitors meet it will find themselves training replacements for workers who left for a 5% raise.
Perhaps the most practical advice from the research is this: operate assuming everyone is planning to leave. That mindset shifts the focus from firefighting to building a workplace where people want to stay. It means improving communication before it breaks down, offering growth paths before they’re demanded, and paying fairly before the offer letter from a competitor arrives.
Frequently Asked Questions About Mass Resignations
How long does the domino effect last after someone quits? â–ľ
Can a mass resignation be stopped once it starts? â–ľ
Should I offer retention bonuses to keep people from leaving? â–ľ
What’s the first thing I should do when multiple employees quit? â–ľ
Which industries in the Philippines are most at risk? â–ľ
How can I tell if my team is at risk of a wave of departures? â–ľ
If this was useful, you might also want to read how bad business advice costs Filipino businesses money — including common retention strategies that do more harm than good.
Sources
How strong values grow companies in the Philippines — Building a culture that reduces turnover starts with clarity of purpose and consistent leadership.
Retention crisis: Philippines firms to see highest employee turnover in Southeast Asia. Philstar, 2025.
Why did multiple employees all quit at the same time?. Emerge Talent, 2025.
Domino Effect: How One Resignation Impacts a Whole Business. Small Business Coach, 2025.
When multiple employees quit at the same time. Hunt Club, 2025.
