Building Climate Resilience in the Philippines

Nine out of ten Filipinos consider climate change a serious problem, according to a 2024 Asian Development Bank survey cited in a recent Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) assessment. That level of public concern places the Philippines among the most climate-conscious populations in Asia, yet the same study found that institutional bottlenecks, funding complexities, and limited local government capacity are slowing the country’s ability to turn that awareness into effective action.

The gap between public support and institutional delivery is not a small one. While nearly six in 10 Filipinos back spending on climate-resilient infrastructure, renewable energy, and public transport, the mechanisms to fund and implement those projects remain fragmented. The PIDS study, titled “Climate Change Perceptions and Climate Finance Mechanisms in the Philippines: A 2025 Assessment,” points to limited technical expertise at the local government level, complex funding requirements, and coordination issues among national agencies as the main reasons why climate plans often stall before they reach the ground. Understanding where these breakdowns occur is the first step toward understanding what it will take to fix them.

What Climate Resilience Actually Means for the Philippines

Climate resilience, in the Philippine context, is not a single policy goal. It is a set of interconnected challenges: protecting communities from flooding and heat, securing food and water supplies, upgrading energy systems, and ensuring that local governments have the capacity to act. The country’s National Adaptation Plan for 2023–2050 covers eight priority sectors, but translating that plan into projects that can be financed and implemented has proven difficult. The core issue is not a lack of awareness — it is a gap between intention and execution.

Why Institutional Barriers Slow Down Climate Action

The PIDS study identified several structural reasons why climate finance does not flow as quickly as it should. Local government units (LGUs), which are expected to play a central role in adaptation and disaster resilience, often lack the technical expertise and project preparation capacity needed to access funds like the People’s Survival Fund (PSF) or international climate finance facilities. Even with increased internal revenue allocations under the Mandanas-Garcia ruling, local funds remain insufficient for the scale of the challenge.

At the national level, fragmented financing mechanisms and coordination issues among agencies complicate the picture. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) faces legal and institutional constraints that limit its ability to directly support climate-related investments, unlike some central banks in the region. Another significant barrier is the limited availability of climate and environmental data, including insufficient infrastructure for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions. These gaps make evidence-based policymaking harder and hinder efforts to assess whether climate programs are actually working.

One scenario illustrates the problem clearly: an LGU in a flood-prone province may have a strong climate adaptation plan on paper, but without the technical staff to prepare a funding proposal, the plan never reaches the People’s Survival Fund. Meanwhile, a national agency with access to international climate finance may not have the local partnerships needed to implement projects on the ground. The result is a system where good intentions outpace execution. The PIDS study stresses that addressing climate change requires more than increasing financial resources — it demands stronger institutions, better policy coordination, and expanded access to climate finance at every level.

What Gets Missed in the Climate Conversation

→ Scroll right to see all columns

The Public Supports Visible Investments — Not Carbon Taxes

The ADB survey revealed a clear preference among Filipinos: nearly six in 10 support spending on climate-resilient infrastructure, renewable energy, and public transport. Support was weaker for carbon taxes and stricter emissions regulations. This does not mean Filipinos oppose climate action — it means they favour measures with visible, direct benefits over abstract pricing mechanisms. For policymakers, this creates a communication challenge: how to build support for the less popular but equally necessary tools, like carbon pricing, that economists consider essential for reducing emissions.

Coal Exemptions Risk Undermining Progress

The government has signalled progress with a moratorium on new coal plants, but exemptions introduced in 2025 risk weakening that policy. Coal remains the main source of electricity generation, and current coal excise duties correspond to roughly EUR 1 per tonne of CO2 — far below estimates of the social cost of carbon. The gap between stated renewable energy targets and actual fossil fuel dependence is one of the most significant tensions in the country’s climate strategy. The government aims to raise the renewable share of electricity from 21 percent today to 35 percent by 2030 and 50 percent by 2040, but achieving those targets will require phasing out exemptions and strengthening enforcement.

Economic Losses Are Not Just a Future Problem

World Bank projections estimate that climate change could cut Philippine GDP by between 6 and 8 percent by 2040, with losses potentially reaching as high as 13.6 percent. The ADB projects economic losses equivalent to 5.3 percent of GDP by 2040 due to sea-level rise, flooding, and lower labor productivity. These are not distant scenarios — they are projections based on current trends. The OECD offers a longer-term view, suggesting GDP losses could reach 4 percent by 2040 and 17 percent by 2070. The variation in these figures reflects different modelling assumptions, but the direction is consistent: the economic cost of inaction is substantial and grows over time.

What Can Be Done — Practical Steps for Building Resilience

While the institutional barriers are real, several concrete actions are already underway or within reach. These range from national modelling efforts to local capacity-building programs and energy sector reforms.

Strengthening Local Government Capacity to Access Climate Funds

The PIDS study makes clear that LGUs need more than money — they need technical support to convert climate plans into fundable projects. The People’s Survival Fund is one of the main domestic sources of adaptation financing, but accessing it requires project proposals that meet specific criteria. LGUs that lack engineers, environmental planners, or financial officers trained in proposal writing are effectively locked out. Capacity-building programs, such as those supported by the UNDP and the Department of Finance through the Climate Finance Network project, aim to close this gap by training local officials in project preparation, financial management, and monitoring. For an LGU looking to access the PSF, the process typically involves: identifying a climate risk priority (e.g., flood control), preparing a feasibility study and environmental impact assessment, submitting a proposal through the Climate Change Commission, and securing endorsement from the local sanggunian. Without technical assistance at each step, many LGUs never make it past the first stage.

Using Economic Modelling to Inform Policy

The Philippines is one of five pilot countries participating in a regional initiative to develop a state-of-the-art modelling tool that integrates climate and economic data. A two-day workshop in July 2025 brought together representatives from 25 national agencies — including the Department of Economy, Planning, and Development, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, and the Department of Agriculture — to explore how this tool can simulate different climate scenarios and assess their implications for national development. For policymakers, this means being able to ask “what if” questions: What happens to agricultural output if temperatures rise by 2°C? How much would investing in coastal defences reduce GDP losses from flooding? The modelling tool does not provide easy answers, but it gives decision-makers a clearer picture of trade-offs and priorities.

Expanding Renewable Energy While Managing the Transition

The government’s renewable energy targets are ambitious: 35 percent of electricity from renewables by 2030 and 50 percent by 2040. A flagship project is Terra Solar, expected to be the world’s largest integrated solar and battery facility, with 3.5 GW of photovoltaic capacity and 4.5 GWh of storage. To accommodate intermittent generation, new solar projects are required to include at least four hours of storage, and the government is upgrading the grid under the Smart Grid and Green Plan. However, coal remains the dominant source of electricity, and the 2025 exemptions to the coal moratorium create uncertainty. For the energy transition to succeed, the government will need to enforce the moratorium consistently while accelerating grid upgrades and storage deployment. The health and environmental co-benefits of shifting away from coal are significant, but the transition must be managed carefully to avoid disrupting electricity supply or raising costs for consumers.

Adaptation Financing Needs a Long-Term Plan

Over the longer term, adaptation financing needs could reach roughly USD 100 billion between 2025 and 2040, according to OECD estimates. That figure covers investments in agriculture, water, health, ecosystems, and infrastructure — the eight priority sectors in the National Adaptation Plan. The PIDS study notes that 45.55 percent of Filipinos support reducing corruption and tax evasion as a means of funding climate action, while 44.7 percent favour greater support from international climate funds. Both approaches will likely be necessary. Domestic resources alone cannot cover the gap, which means strengthening partnerships with multilateral climate funds and ensuring that international financing reaches the local level where it is needed most.

Frequently Asked Questions

Building on What Exists

The Philippines has strong public support for climate action, a National Adaptation Plan covering eight priority sectors, and emerging tools like economic modelling to guide decision-making. The gaps are not in awareness or intention — they are in execution. Strengthening local government capacity, simplifying access to climate funds, enforcing the coal moratorium, and investing in data infrastructure are all achievable steps. The challenge is not starting from scratch; it is making the existing system work better. If this was useful, you might also want to read how water pollution adds another layer to the country’s environmental challenges.

Sources

Pollution and Health Risks for Filipinos — Explores how environmental degradation directly affects public health, a related dimension of climate vulnerability.

PIDS: Funding bottlenecks slow Philippine climate response despite strong public support. Manila Bulletin, 2025.

Towards Resilience and Just Transition: Philippines to Undertake Climate Economic Modelling. UNDP Philippines, 2025.

Confronting climate change in the Philippines: Building resilience while cutting emissions. OECD, 2026.