The Philippines is generating more healthcare waste than ever before, with hazardous medical waste increasing by 20.19 percent over the last five years. That figure, reported by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), translates to a generation rate of roughly 1.13 to 1.31 kilograms per hospital bed per day. For context, a mid-sized hospital with 300 beds could be producing over 350 kilograms of hazardous waste daily — the equivalent of several hundred kilograms of materials that require special handling to avoid harming people and the environment.
These numbers are not abstract. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Metro Manila alone was generating as much as 280 metric tons of healthcare waste per day — nearly six times the pre-pandemic daily average of 47 metric tons. The surge exposed long-standing weaknesses in how the country manages waste from hospitals, clinics, and barangay health stations. And while the pandemic has receded, the waste problem has not. The challenge now is whether the systems in place can handle a volume that shows no sign of shrinking. For a closer look at how environmental degradation affects the broader economy, see our analysis on the economic cost of pollution in the Philippines.
What Makes Healthcare Waste a Distinct Problem
Healthcare waste is not like household trash. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that roughly 85 percent of healthcare waste is general and non-hazardous, while the remaining 15 percent is hazardous — materials that may be infectious, toxic, or radioactive. That 15 percent is the part that demands careful handling. When it is not segregated properly, it contaminates the rest of the waste stream, turning what could have been ordinary trash into hazardous material.
The consequences of mismanagement are not hypothetical. Improper disposal methods — particularly open burning or low-temperature incineration — release harmful pollutants including dioxins, furans, and particulate matter. These substances do not disappear. They settle into soil and water, enter the food chain, and accumulate in human tissue over time. The problem is compounded by the sheer volume of single-use plastics in hospital waste. A 2018 waste audit by Health Care Without Harm Southeast Asia found that 46 to 72 percent of hospital waste consisted of single-use plastics — syringes, personal protective equipment, IV tubing, and packaging. Because these items are often contaminated, they are rarely recycled and typically end up in landfills or incinerators.
Where the System Falls Short: Storage, Collection, and Awareness
In January 2025, over 100 key stakeholders gathered for a national workshop to launch the five-year Philippine Healthcare and Mercury Wastes Management Project (HCW Project). The discussions revealed a litany of operational problems. Partner hospitals reported inadequate waste storage and treatment facilities, compounded by delays in waste collection. Local government units often lack the capacity to handle general waste, while treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities for hazardous waste are scarce or inaccessible.
But infrastructure is only part of the story. A Training Needs Assessment (TNA) survey conducted in June 2025 across 12 barangays near Quirino Memorial Medical Center in Quezon City found significant gaps in knowledge at the community level. The majority of respondents — local government employees — were uncertain about the types of healthcare waste, its sources, how it should be treated, and what impact it has on human health and the environment. Most reported that they had never attended training programs specifically on healthcare waste segregation. Only one out of 12 barangays had informational posters classifying healthcare waste types posted in the office. Only one had trash cans designated for infectious or hazardous waste.
These findings point to a disconnect between policy and practice. While many respondents had attended training on general waste segregation under the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act (R.A. 9003), that knowledge did not translate to healthcare waste. The distinction matters because healthcare waste carries pathogens, sharps, and chemicals that general waste does not. Without targeted training, the risk of contamination — and the environmental release of toxic substances — remains high. For more on how pollution disproportionately affects vulnerable communities, read about pollution’s unequal toll on indigenous Filipinos.
The Mercury Problem That Won’t Go Away
One of the more overlooked dimensions of healthcare waste is mercury. Since 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned mercury-containing products in healthcare facilities — thermometers, sphygmomanometers, dental amalgam capsules, and fluorescent lamps — through FDA Circular No. 2022-003. Most hospitals have shifted to mercury-free alternatives. But the stockpiles of mercury waste that accumulated before the ban have not been properly disposed of.
Mercury is a potent neurotoxin. When mercury-containing waste is incinerated or broken open, the metal can vaporize and travel long distances in the atmosphere before settling into water bodies, where it transforms into methylmercury — a compound that accumulates in fish and, eventually, in the people who eat them. The HCW Project aims to address these stockpiles by ensuring proper storage and eventual disposal, but the gap between policy and execution is wide. Hospitals may have stopped buying mercury thermometers, but the old ones are still sitting in storage rooms, waiting for a disposal solution that does not yet exist at scale.
→ Scroll right to see all columns
| Hospital | Hazardous / Infectious Waste | General Waste | Notable Hazardous Categories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Visayas Medical Center | 217.775 tons | 191.345 tons | Pathologic / infectious |
| Quirino Memorial Medical Center | 496,505 kg | 324,994.79 kg | Mixed hazardous |
| Cagayan Valley Medical Center | 26,118 kg (sharps) + 54 kg (pharma) + 2,603 kg (pathological) | 292,807 kg | Sharps, pharmaceutical, pathological |
The table above shows waste data from three partner hospitals in 2023. The figures illustrate a pattern: hazardous waste volumes are substantial, and the categories vary by facility. At the Cagayan Valley Medical Center, for instance, sharps waste alone totaled over 26,000 kilograms — needles, scalpels, and blades that, if mishandled, pose immediate injury and infection risks. These numbers also highlight the importance of accurate inventory systems, which the HCW Project aims to improve as part of its five-year work plan.
What Is Being Done: The Five-Year Plan and Its Interventions
The Philippine Healthcare and Mercury Wastes Management Project, officially launched in December 2023, is a partnership between UNIDO and the Philippine government, led by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Environmental Management Bureau (DENR-EMB). Funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and executed by the civil society organization BAN Toxics, the project has a clear mandate: reduce the release and emissions of toxic substances from healthcare waste.
The project’s five-year work plan, approved by the Project Steering Committee in January 2025, focuses on several key interventions. First, a policy gap analysis will identify where existing regulations fall short and recommend changes. Second, technical experts will be hired to identify environmentally sound technologies and management strategies. Third, the project will invest heavily in awareness-raising and capacity-building — precisely the kind of training that the barangay-level survey found to be critically lacking.
A central technical focus is reducing unintentional persistent organic pollutants (uPOPs), particularly dioxins and furans. These are released when chlorinated waste materials — such as PVC plastics and chlorine-based disinfectants — are burned. The project will also address mercury waste stockpiles by ensuring proper storage and identifying disposal pathways. Improving waste inventory systems and assessing the technologies and capacities of existing TSD facilities are also on the agenda, with an eye toward identifying opportunities for technology transfer and green financing.
What the Barangay-Level Survey Reveals About Training Gaps
The TNA survey conducted in June 2025 offers a ground-level view of what needs to change. Respondents from the 12 barangays near Quirino Memorial Medical Center expressed genuine interest in attending training programs on healthcare waste management — if those programs were made available and accessible. The gap is not a lack of willingness; it is a lack of opportunity. Most respondents had attended training on general waste segregation, but none had received instruction specific to healthcare waste. This distinction matters because the risks are different. A needle stick injury or exposure to pharmaceutical residue requires a different response than mishandling a soda bottle.
The survey also found that only one barangay had informational posters on healthcare waste types, and only one had dedicated trash cans for infectious or hazardous waste. These are low-cost interventions that could have an outsized impact. Without visual cues and proper containers, even well-intentioned staff are likely to default to general waste practices — mixing hazardous materials with ordinary trash and defeating the purpose of segregation at the source. For more on how urban pollution crises unfold in Metro Manila, see our coverage of the urban pollution crisis in Metro Manila.
Frequently Asked Questions About Healthcare Waste in the Philippines
What types of waste do hospitals generate? ▾
Why is open burning of medical waste dangerous? ▾
Are mercury thermometers still used in Philippine hospitals? ▾
How much healthcare waste did the Philippines generate during the pandemic? ▾
What is the HCW Project and who funds it? ▾
Can contaminated medical plastics be recycled? ▾
What the Coming Years Will Determine
The HCW Project has a five-year timeline, and its success will depend on whether it can translate national-level planning into barangay-level action. The policy gap analysis, technology assessments, and training programs are all necessary pieces, but they will only matter if they reach the people handling waste every day — hospital janitors, barangay health workers, and LGU staff who currently lack the tools and knowledge to do the job safely. The survey from Quezon City suggests that the demand for training is there. The question is whether the supply will follow.
If this was useful, you might also want to read how mine waste continues to poison Filipino land and water.
Sources
Philippines drowning in plastic trash — A broader look at the country’s plastic waste crisis and its environmental consequences.
Community climate adaptation insights from the Philippines — How local communities are building resilience against environmental threats.
PHL healthcare waste generation on the rise. BusinessMirror, 2025.
Training gaps and mismanaged medical waste: A closer look at barangay healthcare waste management systems in Project 4, Quezon City, Metro Manila. BAN Toxics, 2025.





