Philippines’ Last Frontier: Safeguarding Nature

Palawan, often called the Philippines’ “last ecological frontier,” holds an outsized share of the country’s remaining natural wealth. Environmental groups estimate the province may contain close to half of all the Philippines’ remaining untouched, old-growth forest, as well as 30 percent of its remaining mangroves and up to 40 percent of its coral reefs. These figures are not just impressive statistics — they represent the last strongholds of ecosystems that have already been lost or degraded across most of the archipelago. What happens to Palawan in the coming years will affect biodiversity far beyond its shores.

The province’s significance extends beyond national borders. In 1990, UNESCO declared Palawan a Biosphere Reserve under its Man and the Biosphere Programme, recognising the province’s globally significant ecosystems and conservation value. The island sits at the edge of the West Philippine Sea, one of the world’s most contested maritime regions, making its environmental health a matter of regional diplomacy as much as local governance. For a deeper look at how industrial activity affects natural resources elsewhere in the country, you can read about industrialization’s pollution impact on Philippine agriculture.

What Makes Palawan a Conservation Priority

The core tension in Palawan is straightforward but the consequences are not. The island holds some of the world’s most valuable nickel laterite deposits — laterite deposits account for about 70 percent of the world’s reserves of nickel, a mineral now in high demand for manufacturing batteries, especially for electric cars and clean energy infrastructure. The global push for clean energy has created a paradox: the minerals needed to build a low-carbon future are being extracted from some of the last intact ecosystems on the planet. According to modelling cited by the Guardian, using clean energy to limit global heating to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels would require almost 300 new mines by 2030, extracting minerals with a market value of close to $800 billion by 2040.

Analysis produced for the Guardian by academics found more than 3,267 instances of mining within key biodiversity areas globally, accounting for nearly 5 percent of the sector’s footprint. Palawan is not an isolated case — it is part of a worldwide pattern where mineral demand drives extraction into ecologically sensitive zones. The question is whether the island can chart a different course.

How Mining Affects Local Communities and Ecosystems

The impacts of mining in Palawan are not abstract. Roddy Masap, a fisherman who has been fishing in the waters off Palawan “since I was born,” told the Guardian that fish began disappearing from his bay about four years ago — shortly after the mine expanded and shipped out its first 50,000 tonnes of nickel ore to China. Once, a good day would bring in 40 kilograms of fish. Now, their catch is often as little as 7 kilograms. “There used to be fish near the shore, but now we can’t get fish here — we have to go out deep into the sea,” he said.

Agricultural communities have also felt the effects. One farmer reported that his family’s rice yields have dropped steadily since the mine started operating. He and his family get painful, itchy rashes after contact with the silt, and his nieces and nephews have developed long-term coughs since the stockpile was built. The mining company has stated that “laterite is not considered toxic and is not the cause of losses for farmers or fishermen, nor does it have any negative effects on human health.” However, environmental scientists note that while nickel laterite is not toxic in its undisturbed form, when processed or washed into waterways it can release nickel and chromium — both of which pose health risks at elevated concentrations.

These local accounts illustrate a broader pattern. The forested mountain ranges of Victoria-Anepahan and Bulanjao in Palawan face multiple pressures, including existing and planned development projects. The remaining forests in these areas are located within the ancestral domain of Indigenous peoples, who have managed these ecosystems for generations. For more on how environmental degradation affects coastal communities, see our coverage of Philippine coasts pollution peril.

What Gets Overlooked in the Mining Debate

The conversation about mining in Palawan often focuses on jobs versus conservation, but several important dimensions receive less attention. Understanding these nuances is essential for anyone trying to make sense of the competing claims.

→ Scroll right to see all columns

The Exemption Loophole

In 2015, the mining company Global Ferronickel Holdings bought Ipilan Nickel Corp, and its rights to a huge deposit on Mt Mantalingahan, one of the island’s protected areas, behind Brooke’s Point. This is one of 11 established, active mining projects dotted over Palawan that were exempted from a 2025 moratorium on mining expansion. The exemption means that while new mining permits are theoretically frozen, existing operations can continue — and in some cases expand — within protected landscapes.

The Clean Energy Paradox

The global demand for nickel, driven by electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy storage, creates pressure to extract minerals from places like Palawan. But the ecological cost of opening new mines in biodiversity hotspots may undermine the environmental benefits those minerals are meant to enable. Miners are digging in locations never previously occupied by humans, such as the tabletop tepuis mountains of Venezuela — earthbound “islands” more than 1,000 metres high, where unique species have evolved in isolation over millennia. Palawan faces a similar dynamic: its isolation has produced species found nowhere else, and mining threatens to erase them before they are even fully documented.

Indigenous Land Rights as a Conservation Strategy

One approach that receives less attention than it deserves is the role of Indigenous land tenure in protecting forests. The IUCN is working on a project to support at least 4,200 Indigenous people in and around the Victoria-Anepahan and Bulanjao Key Biodiversity Areas to secure their land rights through certificates of communal ownership. The project aims to support sustainable forest management across 55,000 hectares of Indigenous territories, including the designation of 15,000 hectares as Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserved Areas and Territories — often referred to as ICCAs-territories of life — and 3,000 hectares of old-growth forest protected as critical habitat. This approach ties conservation directly to the people who have lived on and managed these lands for generations. For more on government efforts to address environmental challenges, read about the Philippine government’s fight for a clean environment.

What Can Be Done: Practical Steps for Conservation and Livelihoods

Addressing the pressures on Palawan requires action at multiple levels — from local communities to international policy. The following approaches are grounded in existing projects and proposals that have shown promise.

Securing Indigenous Land Rights

The IUCN project in Palawan provides a concrete model. The process involves helping Indigenous communities obtain certificates of communal ownership over their ancestral domains, which gives them legal standing to manage forest resources and exclude destructive activities. Once land rights are secured, communities can develop sustainable development and protection plans for their territories. The project aims to establish at least 13 enterprises based on non-timber forest products and agro-forestry, providing economic alternatives to mining and logging. The economic resilience of 775 Indigenous people — 400 women and 375 men — is targeted for improvement.

• 1
  Secure Ancestral Domain Claims

  Apply for Certificates of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) through the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP). This legal recognition is the foundation for all subsequent conservation and livelihood activities.

• 2
  Develop Community Conservation Plans

  Work with local government units and NGOs to create sustainable forest management plans that designate protected zones while allowing controlled use of non-timber forest products.

• 3
  Establish Alternative Livelihood Enterprises

  Set up community-based enterprises focused on agro-forestry, honey production, or eco-tourism that provide income without requiring forest clearance or mining.

Strengthening Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues

Environmental conflicts in Palawan cannot be resolved by any single group. The IUCN project includes engagement with municipal and provincial governments and multi-stakeholder dialogues that bring together Indigenous leaders, mining companies, government agencies, and environmental organisations. These dialogues aim to create shared understanding of trade-offs and to identify areas where conservation and development can coexist. The project also supports meaningful participation of Indigenous peoples and local communities in policy spaces and processes — ensuring that those most affected by mining decisions have a seat at the table.

Future-Phase: ASEAN and International Cooperation

The Philippines assumed the ASEAN chairship in 2026 with the theme “Navigating Our Future, Together,” emphasizing regional unity, resilience and cooperation amid global uncertainties. Palawan’s role within the BIMP-EAGA (Brunei-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area) initiative, established in 1994 to accelerate development in remote areas through cross-border cooperation, positions the province as a test case for whether economic integration and environmental protection can be pursued simultaneously. The province’s status as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve gives it international visibility that could attract conservation funding and technical support — but only if local and national governments prioritise protection over extraction.

Frequently Asked Questions About Palawan’s Environmental Challenges

What to Watch For Next

The future of Palawan will be determined in the next few years. The 2025 mining moratorium exemption for existing projects means that current operations can continue, but the debate over whether to allow new mines or expand existing ones is far from settled. The Philippines’ ASEAN chairship in 2026 provides a platform to elevate Palawan’s status as a regional conservation priority, but rhetoric must be matched by enforcement and funding. For those following the issue, the key indicators to watch are: whether Indigenous communities receive their certificates of communal ownership, whether the 11 exempted mining projects expand their footprint, and whether alternative livelihood enterprises gain enough traction to provide real economic alternatives. If this was useful, you might also want to read which corporations lead in sachet production.

Sources

Manila’s waste management crisis uncovered — Examines how urban waste systems struggle to keep pace with population growth and consumption patterns.

Clean energy demands pit Philippines island against mining interests. The Guardian, 2026.

Palawan at the heart of ASEAN: Why the Philippines’ last frontier matters to Southeast Asia. Philippine Information Agency, 2026.

Indigenous leadership for biodiversity protection in Philippines’ last ecological frontier. IUCN Netherlands, 2025.